|
QUESTION: “What do you think of having Hillary
Clinton as President of the United States?”
“There
is a lot of discussion and news relating to the issue of
Hillary Clinton as president. Some
are very favorable to this, saying that it is finally time
for the United States to have a woman in this important
position. Others
are against this, saying that a woman should not be in
this position. What
do you think? What
does the Bible say?”
ANSWER
Obviously, what I think about this is
of little consequence. The
real issue is that which Paul raised: “What does the Scripture
say?” (Romans 4:3a). God,
through His Word, must be our final authority in all matters,
including the issue of the presidency. We
must not go to educational institutions, entertainment celebrities,
politicians, sociologists, or religious leaders for the answer.
Over the years, women have occupied leading
roles in Great Britain, India, Pakistan, and other nations. This
fact is not decisive, but it does reveal that women, under
certain circumstances, have the ability to lead on a national
level. Thus,
it is not whether a woman can lead or whether a woman can
command the loyalty of a certain element of voting public,
but what God thinks about this question. There
are several points that we should bear in mind on this issue.
First, the issue is not Hillary Clinton. Many
oppose her because of the unethical and immoral influence
that Bill Clinton had when he occupied the White House for
eight years. They
would say—and rightly so—that Hillary holds the same liberal
and immoral views as Bill, her husband. But
the issue goes beyond Hillary as a person. The
basic question is whether a woman should assume the office
of the presidency.
Second, it is clear that God restricts
a woman’s role in society. Some
would say that the Biblical restrictions only relate to the
home and the church. They
would admit that a woman is not to have authority over her
husband and should not have authority in a religious context. Yet,
they would allow nearly unrestricted female participation
in other places of society. Therefore, a woman could be the
president of a company, a manager over men, or a teacher
over men, with no problem at all. They
could have authority in education, business, government,
and all other fields of endeavor. This
would want many liberal, feminist, and even religious leaders
would contend.
Third, Scripture does say that a woman
is to be submissive in the marriage, while the husband is
the head over her (Ephesians 5:21-33; 1 Peter 3:1-7; Titus
2:4-5). It further
says that the woman is not to teach over a man (1 Timothy
2:11-12) or speak in the assembly of saints (1 Corinthians
14:33-37); she is to be submissive in this context (cf. both
of these scriptures). Let’s
hold to this truth before even considering the wider question.
Fourth, this issue goes beyond the home
and the church. The
woman is to take a subordinate position in regard to man in
general, not merely in the home and church. Paul
makes this clear: “Christ is the head of every man, and the
man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ” (1
Corinthians 11:3). This
is based on such fundamental principles as the man’s priority
in creation (v. 8) and the fact that the “man was not created
for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake” (v. 9). (In
1 Timothy 2:11-15, Paul roots his teaching about women in
two basic principles—that of the priority of man in creation
and the priority of woman in deception.) The
apostle goes on to say that there is a mutual interdependence
between the man and the woman (vv. 11-12), but male authority
does prevail (v. 3). This
would lead us to conclude that a woman is not to be the “head” or
authority in society in general and not merely in the marriage,
the home, and the body of Christ.
We must emphasize that these facts do
not suggest that a woman cannot be capable, educated, intelligent,
and wise. Indeed,
many women have more wisdom than their husband does, may have more intelligence than
he does, and may have more skills than he possesses. At
the same time, we must strongly denounce the feminist position
that a woman can exercise authority over men and occupy positions
of leadership. This
would include the presidency of the United States and other
national governments. It
is much wiser to heed the God who created male and female
than to put our confidence in public opinion or the polls.
Richard
Hollerman
|